Detect and Remove Spyware

Scan, Detect & Remove Spyware and Adware From Your PC With Top Anti-Spyware Software & Tips

Best Way to Remove Computer Viruses

Jan-24-2011 By Gary Granberry

Spyware removal software is a must these days if you want to keep your computer free of viruses. With the growing number of computer attacks from the internet and email it’s imperative that you run a quality antivirus program as well. It’s hard to decide which is best because everyone claims they have the best software. But if your system gets infected due to faulty antivirus software than you’re going to need a spyware removal tool.

Some of the best antivirus programs on the market today are Kasperky, Panda and ESET Nod 32. If you prefer another brand that’s fine, just make sure you have something installed as your first line of defense. But in the event that your system does become infected with spyware you will be faced with the problem of trying to remove it. Here are my top two tools for removing spyware.

SuperAntiSpyware has a free version

This software is extremely effective at removing viruses and malware if you find that your computer has become infected with spyware. It’s not widely popular among the masses but for those who do PC repair or computer consulting, it’s one of the best free tools to have in your arsenal. SuperAntiSpyware offers a paid version as well, but I have used the free version successfully many times.

SuperAntiSpyware is easy to load, sits quietly in the background of your computer and, unlike some other programs, does not conflict with your current antivirus software. The paid version offers real time protection and also a feature called “First Chance Prevention”, which will examine fifty crucial points of your system every time your system starts up and shuts down. This will eliminate every threat before it has a chance to infect and infiltrate your system.

Malwarebytes has become very popular

Malwarebytes is also at the top of the list when it comes to spyware removal software. It probably doesn’t get the recognition it should because it gets edged out by some of the big names but trust me, this is a very effective piece of free software. It features a quick scan option as well which can run through your system in about six to nine minutes and has the ability to detect false positives which sometimes occur.

It has the ability to scan multiple drives as well, including networked and external drives. And, it will do an individual file scan if that’s all you want to do. The user interface and setup menus are really easy and it seems to have been designed with the new user in mind because it’s pretty intuitive.

Viruses Explained

Remember, malware, which stands for malicious software is a “type” of computer virus and has many names which include, worms, adware, rootkits and trojans, just to name a few. The reason we have so many names for what essentially is really the same thing is because it helps us identify exactly “how” our computer got infected. The best line of defense obviously is to install a good piece of virus protection software so you don’t get infected in the first place. But if you do get an infection then run SuperAntiSypware and Malwarebytes.

The principle causes for most computer problems and failures is most always due to some form of spyware or virus. I’ve worked on many computers over the years and these two programs are the core tools I use on a regular basis. Now there are times when a registry tweak is necessary but as a rule these two software programs work without a problem 9 times out of 10.

New viruses arrive on the scene daily and that’s why it’s important to update the virus definitions with these two pieces of software and run them in conjunction with one another. They will complement each other and help keep your system fully protected. The free versions are great and should do the job for most people but if you want to get ongoing real time protection you will have to get the paid versions.

Everyone who spends time online downloading files or email attachements should have a tool installed on their system in order to avoid computer viruses. To read more about how computers really work just visit Computer Repair Albuquerque by clicking here.

categories: computers,spyware,computer virus,malware,software,internet,spam,web design,programming,hardware,email,blogs,web masters

Thousands Of Sites Loaded With Malware

Oct-28-2009 By Aleksandro Imles

Cybercriminals have laced about 2,000 legitimate websites with a potent malware cocktail that surreptitiously attacks people who browse to them, a security researcher warned Friday.

Unlike past outbreaks of the mass web attack known as Gumblar, this round actually plants exploit code on the website servers themselves. Curiously, the directory and file name of the malicious payload is in most cases unique and identical to a legitimate file that existed on the website.

The trick makes it extremely difficult for webmasters and anti-malware programs to detect the threats.

“This is an ugly can of worms,” said Mary Landesman, the ScanSafe security researcher who warned of the mass attack. “Any time you see a new technique evolve like this the concern is we’ll be seeing much more of this in the future, and certainly it complicates the remediation of the compromised website.”

Previously, Gumblar planted links in thousands of compromised websites that silently redirected users to a handful of servers that hosted the exploits. That method allowed white hats to foil the attack by shutting down one or two domains. With the malware embedded directly in the compromised websites, the take-down process is significantly more time consuming.

Also making matters hard for Landesman to get the sites cleaned up: Most of the websites belong to small businesses that cater to non-English speakers. Few of them have dedicated security employees, and even when representatives can be located, the person contacting them must speak multiple languages.

While the websites are relatively small, Gumblar architects have planted links in online discussion forums across the web that often cause RSS readers to automatically send users to the booby-trapped pages. Landesman suspects black-hat search engine optimization may also be causing the infected sites to be featured prominently in results returned by Google and others.

People who are unfortunate enough to visit the sites won’t see anything unusual. But behind the scenes, a PHP script checks their version of Adobe Reader and Adobe Flash, and if their out of date, hijacks their PCs using known vulnerabilities. If both of those programs are up to date, the script tests to see if the system is vulnerable to several bugs Microsoft has patched in the last few months.

Hijacked machines will be installed with a backdoor that gives the hijackers complete control. They are also equipped with malware that manipulates search results returned by Google.

It’s unclear exactly how the sites are getting compromised. Landesman suspects FTP passwords for the sites have been lifted from administrators’ computers using key-logging malware.

Arhur Monderos is working in a company as antivirus software specialist and he runs his cool blog where he helps you to choose best antivirus software for you computer.

categories: antivirus,software,virus,computers,security,malware,technology,blogs,internet,business,help,education,free

Biggest Security Vulnerability Is Anonymity

Oct-21-2009 By Aleksandro Imles

The CEO of Russia’s No. 1 anti-virus package has said that the internet’s biggest security vulnerability is anonymity, calling for mandatory internet passports that would work much like driver licenses do in the offline world.

The comments by Eugene Kaspersky, who is also the founder of Kaspersky Lab, came during an interview this week with Vivian Yeo of ZDNet Asia. In it, he proposed the formation of an internet police body that would require users everywhere to be uniquely identified.

“Everyone should and must have an identification, or internet passport,” he was quoted as saying. “The internet was designed not for public use, but for American scientists and the US military. Then it was introduced to the public and it was wrongto introduce it in the same way.”

Kaspersky, whose comments are raising the eyebrows of some civil liberties advocates, went on to say such a system shouldn’t be voluntary.

“I’d like to change the design of the internet by introducing regulation – internet passports, internet police and international agreement – about following internet standards,” he continued. “And if some countries don’t agree with or don’t pay attention to the agreement, just cut them off.”

He rejected the notion that internet protocol numbers were sufficient for tracking a user, arguing they are too easy to come by.

“You’re not sure who exactly has the connection,” he explained. “Even if the IP address is traced to an internet cafe, they will not know who the customer or person is behind the attacks. Think about cars – you have plates on cars, but you also have driver licenses.”

Kaspersky was traveling on Friday and not available to be interviewed for this article. A company spokeswoman declined to comment.

Kaspersky admitted such a system would be hard to put in place because of the cost and difficulty of reaching international agreements. But remarkably, his interview transcript spends no time contemplating the inevitable downsides that would come in a world where internet anonymity is a thing of the past.

“You could make the same argument about the offline world,” said Matt Zimmerman, a senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. “You know, every purchase you make should be tracked, we should ban the use of cash, we should put cameras up everywhere because in that massive data collection something might be collected to help someone. But we think privacy is an important enough countervailing value that we should prevent that.”

In Kaspersky’s world, services such as Psiphon and The Onion Router (Tor) – which are legitimately used by Chinese dissidents and Google users alike to shield personally identifiable information – would no longer be legal. Or at least they’d have to be redesigned from the ground up to give police the ability to surveil them. That’s not the kind of world many law-abiding citizens would feel comfortable inhabiting.

And aside from the disturbing big-brother scenario, there are the problematic logistics of requiring every internet user anywhere in the world to connect using an internationally approved device that authenticates his unique identity. There’s no telling how many innovations might be squashed under a system like that.

No doubt, the cybercriminals that Kaspersky has valiantly fought for more than a decade are only getting better at finding ways to exploit weaknesses in internet technologies increasingly at the heart of the way we shop, socialize and work. But to paraphrase Benjamin Franklin, those who sacrifice net liberty for incremental increases in security no doubt will get neither.

Arhur Monderos is working in a company as antivirus software specialist and he runs his cool blog where he helps you to choose best antivirus software for you computer.

categories: antivirus,software,virus,computers,security,malware,technology,blogs,internet,business,help,education,free

Delta Hacked My Email

Oct-21-2009 By Arhur Monderos

An airline passenger rights advocate is accusing Delta Air Lines of hacking into her computer and e-mail accounts to sabotage her organization’s attempts to mandate basic services during flight delays.

Kate Hanni, a resident of California, is the founder of the Coalition for an Airline Passengers Bill of Rights, an organization lobbying for federal laws that require airlines to provide bathroom access, clean air, and access to medical treatment when passengers are held up for hours on the tarmac. The legislation would also give passengers an option to exit the plane if they have been delayed on the tarmac for over three hours. Four versions of a “Airline Passenger’s Bill of Rights of 2009″ are currently pending before Congress.

In a lawsuit filed in Houston, Texas on Tuesday, Hanni accuses the world’s largest airline carrier and an aviation consulting firm of conspiring to breach her computer and email in order to derail her lobbying efforts. She seeks a minimum of $11m in damages.

According to court documents, Hanni claims earlier this year she began exchanging emails with Frederick Foreman, an analyst with Virginia-based Metron Aviation who was researching US government airline surface delay data. During their correspondence, both swapped data and information about surface delays without explicit permission from Metron, of which Delta is a client.

Hanni said her PC and American Online email account were both accessed illegally this summer, with AOL confirming the email breach. Some of her data was copied to an unknown location, and other files were corrupted and rendered useless.

The plot thickens in Foreman’s affidavit. He claims that on September 25, 2009, Metron executives confronted him with “what appeared to be hacked and stolen email communications” between Hanni and himself, as well as two media contacts. The emails were sent from his private accounts on MSN and AOL and not sent through Metron’s internal email system, he claims.

Foreman states in his sworn affidavit that the executive informed him the emails were sent to the Metron from Delta and that the airline was “mad and upset” Hanni had been provided with the flight delay information. Foreman claims he tried to explain that the data was publicly available online from US government statistics, but was still fired and escorted off the premises.

When reached for comment, Delta flatly stated, “the allegation that we would hack an individual’s e-mail is absurd.”

Hanni claims Delta has a motive for seeking and destroying her data because if passenger rights bills are passed, airlines stand to lose over $40m in revenues in addition to millions more in accommodations for customers exiting planes during long delays. Currently, airlines are not restricted by law on how long planes can hold passengers on the tarmac.

Arhur Monderos is working in a company as antivirus software specialist and he runs his cool blog where he helps you to choose best antivirus software for you computer.

categories: antivirus,software,virus,computers,security,malware,technology,blogs,internet,business,help,education,free

Mozilla Detects Insecure Firefox Plugins

Oct-18-2009 By Arhur Monderos

Mozilla has introduced a service that checks Firefox browser plugins to make sure they don’t have known security vulnerabilities or incompatibilities.

The service debuted on Tuesday with this page, which checks 15 plugins to make sure they’re the most recent versions. Over time, Mozilla developers plan to scan additional addons, and they also plan to embed a feature into version 3.6 of the open-source browser that will automatically indicate which plugins used on a current page are out of date.

The offering builds on a feature Mozilla rolled out last month that warned Firefox users when they had an out-of-date version of Adobe’s Flash media player installed. In its first week, Mozilla statistics showed more than half of those who installed the latest Firefox release were running an insecure version of the frequently attacked plugin.

Not that the service has necessarily gotten off to as good a start as one might hope. Our tests failed to detect the use of Adobe Reader, another application widely abused by criminals. And other plugins, such as Google Picasa and the iTunes Application Detector were also left out in the cold.

But as Mozilla makes clear here, the page is only the beginning. Eventually, the organization plans to “create a self-service panel for vendors to update their plugin info as new releases come out.”

It’s initiatives such as these that demonstrate Mozilla’s dedication to the security of its users, and for that it deserves props. When legions of end users keep internet-facing software updated, we all win.

“We strongly recommend that add-on developers require SSL for updates to prevent the attack described above,” Window Snyder, chief security officer for Mozilla, stated in a post to the group’s developer blog.

The Mozilla Foundation released on Wednesday a patch for both version 1.5 and version 2.0 of the browser, fixing a critical memory corruption flaw.

Arhur Monderos is working in a company as antivirus software specialist and he runs his cool blog where he helps you to choose best antivirus software for you computer.

categories: antivirus,software,virus,computers,security,malware,technology,blogs,internet,business,help,education,free